Wednesday, 18 January 2012

Differentiation and The Nintendo Wii

Below is my analysis on a Case Study today I read today on Nintendo and how it completely disrupted the gaming market with the Nintendo Wii-Amazing what you can do by just thinking a little differently.


From the bus stop on the way to work, your internet browsing at home, to the branded coffee cup in your hand, we are bombarded daily with hundreds of marketing messages and brand communications. The drivers behind these corporate campaigns are a range of diverse and inter related goods and services all fighting and competing for your attention and ultimately, dominant market share. Differentiation today, is more important than ever. 




To put it simply by adopting a differentiation strategy a firm’s aim is to produce unique products and services for customers who value differentiated or innovative features more than they value low cost. A prime example of this would be the growing trend in popularity of Apple Inc products and the increased use of Google chrome and Google apps- all of which have innovation and design orientations. Through uniquely satisfying customer needs, firms that follow a differentiation strategy are able to charge premium prices and gain significant customer loyalty in the process. However differentiation should not only be subject to the technology industry. Dynamic capability can be utilized within any organization to identify possible primary and support activities that allow a firm to differentiate a good or service. 



"Differentiation is the essence of strategy, the prime source of competitive advantage"


In the year 2000 the gaming industry was ruled by three big players; Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo. The level of competition between these companies was fierce and the industry was driven by their products; Sony’s Playstation 2, Microsoft’s Xbox and Nintendo’s GameCube.

The strategies of this “big three” and the innovations of the industry were focused on furthering the technological advancements of their products. A battle consistently won by Sony’s Playstation console. The integration of better graphical displays, increased hardware capacity and faster processing speeds were the sources of higher perceived customer value and competitive advantage.


It was not until 2006 when Nintendo began to implement a differentiation strategy that the dynamic of the industry shifted. Nintendo identified potential risks facing the industry, the most worrying of which was the ever growing complexity and the high user involvement required of video games, something that had no appeal to non gamers and people with busy lifestyles. Nintendo devised a radically different strategy aimed at targeting non gamers in order to create a potentially greater market free of demographics, experienced gamers and gender. Nintendo “thought seriously about what a game console should be” and launched its new console the Nintendo Wii in 2008.




“For some time we have believed the game industry is ready for disruption. It is what we all need to expand our audience. It is what we all need to expand our imaginations.”



(Iwata - President of Nintendo Co. Ltd 2006)





Nintendo saw what the gaming industry what was doing and identified the potential of creating a console that would appeal to non gamers. The bridge to this opportunity was the Wii which incorporated innovation, design and a disruptive technology to the gaming industry, Motion Detectors, enabling real life simulation of various sports and games. The success of the Wii even allowed Nintendo to become Japan’s most valuable listed company after Toyota in September 2007. Many businesses would argue that they do not possess the tacit knowledge necessary to achieve “disruption through differentiation”


I read a great article in the December issue of HBR by Zook and Allen where they called the development and implementation of a differentiation strategy the “Great Repeatable Business Model”- It really is a great title and fits perfectly! Differentiation, as a strategy is certainly here to stay, as more and more businesses opt to implement it to remain competitive it is important they do not necessarily view it as requiring a complete re invention of the company’s products or services. Many businesses and top level managers hear the term differentiation and immediately think -new marketing research, new product development and of course, new costs. Differentiation strategy is more effective when viewed as a process for fundamentally building on core competencies, identifying the unique competitive aspects of your businesses offering and then delivering that differentiation to the customer.



Author: Declan Egan




Tuesday, 17 January 2012

Ryanair + Price= Quality

Just seen some tweets of people hating on Ryanair yet again. This always frustrates me, imagine how many less trips, sights and experiences we'd have without the low cost airline.



The word quality bears no significance in today’s Ireland.
A nation still in the midst of its worst recession ever and yet it seems as though general consumer prices are still the same. Quality in terms of a paid service should include many things, but in today’s market it filters down to one fundamental: Price.
I guess it really comes down to how you perceive Quality and indeed value. And that’s exactly the problem. There is a totally backwards concept of it in Ireland today.  Take the general ravings of the public of the poor customer service and unfair charges of Ryanair (you were warned not to go over 20kg!), something that infuriates me.
Yes it seems that the horrific customer service, outrageous charges and the all in all uncomfortable experience of flying with Ryanair culminates directly into a service of definite bad quality. Meaning that less people are flying with Ryanair right?
Well, Not exactly. In July 2010 Ryanair became the first airline in Europe ever to carry more than 7 million passengers in one month. Today the airline flies to over 1,100 routes and to more than 155 airports in 26 countries. It seems that in amidst of all this bad press exists, dare I say, a quality service. Why else would so many people fly with Ryanair as oppose to competitors’?
It doesn’t take a genius to know why either; price. No matter how much we hate to admit it, the Ryanair service plus its price equals excellent quality and when taking a quality-value based approach, quality and value are two of the same.

In the words of the eccentric CEO of Ryanair, Michael O’Leary commercial air passengers should no longer be perceived as “delicate creatures” reliant on “free pillows, blankets, and tea.” Flying should be “quick, efficient, safe” and above all else “affordable”.




Ryanair won’t be winning any customer service awards or indeed most comfortable flyer 2012, but when perceiving quality In relation to price Ryanair is the market leader in Europe. With a focus on internal efficiency and external effectiveness, Ryanair meets customer expectations by offering a commoditized way of getting from A to B and exceeds customer expectations with price.



Author: Declan Egan

Innovation and P&G

Read an interesting article today on how P&G have tripled their innovation success rate






Innovation is truly at the heart of Proctor and Gamble and has allowed them to achieve tremendous year on year growth. However in the early 2000s only a very small percentage of its new products were meeting their revenue and profit targets.

Fast forward to today and P&G has tripled its innovation success rate, the result of a strategic effort by P&G over the past decade to systematize innovation and growth. P&G has no misconceptions of their history and completely understands how innovation is an incremental part of the company’s success story.

P&G recognized growth "couldn’t come from simply doing more of the same thing” CEO Bob McDonald notes “We know from our history that while promotions may win quarters, innovation wins decades.”
A key example of this strategic effort is that of “Tide,” A laundry detergent and the company’s biggest brand. The well established “Tide” brand performed consistenly for P&G. Early 2000s however, it was no longer growing fast enough to support P&G’s needs.

A decade later and Tide’s revenues have almost doubled. How you ask? Well previosuly the tide brand consisted of only one product; laundry detergent. Today however, the tide name has an extensive product mix (Tide Stain Release, Swash Odour Spray to name a few).

P&G has also taken the brand to emerging markets. With research showing that 80% of consumers in India wash their clothes by hand, P&G saw an opportunity. The team came up with “Tide Naturals” which cleaned clothes well without causing irritation to the consumer’s skin. Perfecting this innovative surge was P&G’s pricing of TideNaturals, 30% lower to comparable cleaners.

Tide is a shining example of taking product and adding the innovative prowess of P&G and their vision to create new product lines.

But what about an entirely new business Model? Can P&Gs innovation stretch that far?
It seems so. Tide Dry Cleaners was setup when a team began exploring ways to disrupt the dry cleaning market and arose from the general conception of traditional dry cleaners being, “unfriendly, dingy” places with inconvenient hours. It's appears that P&G's innovation is as sustainable as it is brilliant.

Author: Declan Egan
http://www.linkedin.com/profile/edit?trk=hb_tab_pro_top